Monday, April 30, 2012

When Writing Is It

Some people ask, how do you know you're a writer?

Answers vary: when I've finished the first draft of my first novel; when I've been accepted by an agent; when I've been published; when I've sold X amount of books; when I'm an answer on Jeopardy!

I think the answer is more simple and more complex than that.

As I'm sure a great many of you know, Terry Pratchett suffers from Alzheimer's. He announced his condition in 2007 - notably responding: "there's time for at least a few more books yet."

Pratchett also has recently become very vocal about assisted suicide and apparently has his own consent papers for Switzerland's assisted suicide clinic Dignitas. But he hasn't signed yet..."The only thing stopping me [signing them] is that I have made this film [Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die, a BBC2 documentary] and I have a bloody book to finish."

Nowadays, Pratchett writes via voice recognition software because he can't type anymore. But he's still writing. Still telling stories. Still telling people where to go if they don't like what he does.

And I think that's what makes you a writer: when the world gives you a sh*t hand and you're still at it. P.G. Wodehouse died with a pen in his hand. Mark Twain, suffering from horrid arthritis in his right hand, learned to write left-handed. Anne Rice's daughter died and she created Interview with the Vampire - and a young, immortal character named Claudia. Let's not forget Elle editor Jean-Dominique Bauby who freakin' blinked his booked The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.

I think you know you're a writer, a real writer, when you're willing to write through anything: cancer, Alzheimer's, arthritis, losing your job, divorce, or whatever dark, horrible thing you can think of - and you know that writing will make you feel better. It has nothing to do with publishing or money or fame. Just telling stories lifts some of that burden up and off of you.

Sure. Eventually that other stuff might catch up with you...but in the meantime, there's a bloody book to finish.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Inefective Ink Prompt

The lovely folks over at Inefective Ink have loads of prompts that you can pick from. However, for this week's Saturday pages, I offer you my favorite: The seance was a far greater success than any of us were prepared for. Check out their full list of prompts here.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Quick Change Artist

Something you'll notice very quickly when you read Pratchett is that, for a lot of his books, he doesn't stay in one place long.  Pratchett likes to skip around POVs.  The question is, why?  (Jenny may chime in on this one, because this bouncing is one of her pet peeves with Pratchett.)

Sometimes, authors use roving POV to create a sense of scale.  When you have multiple character POVs, it helps to expand your world.  Lots of people in lots of places give the reader a sense of how all the gears fit together and affect each other.  Character A sets into motion a chain of events that will trickle through Characters B-D and eventually affect Character E.  This can also be a great way to build tension and foreshadow - something George R. R. Martin's POV shifts do often.

Pratchett will use his POV shifts for this sometimes, but often, he's doing it for comedy.  Some of his POV shifts are for the express purpose of creating/maintaining a running gag.  One character, Cut Me Own Throat Dibbler, pops up in a lot of Discworld books.  He's never really a key character, but Pratchett cuts to him time and again.  He's going for the chuckle.  CMOT Dibbler is a running gag and the POV shift is how he, well, runs the gag.

Also, sometimes the abrupt scene change is enough to keep the reader off balance enough that it increases the comedic impact of whatever follows.  If you've ever watched classic Monty Python, you know what I'm talking about.

And now, for something completely different

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Blame it on the Baseball: A Tuesday Post of Accountability

Hello Tuesday and writer-friends! Time to be held accountable for our writing actions...or lack thereof.

Unfortunately, I fall into that "Lack Thereof" category this week.

And I blame baseball.

Not the major league kinda baseball - the way-more-intense world of Babe Ruth League baseball for children 9-10 years old. The world of baseball that my ten year old son now inhabits. The kind of baseball that demands I participate as one of the Moms. Snack times, gathering equipment, and all of that time/soul-sucking stuff. (And this is just the preseason...I can't believe how much these boys and girls play!)

Since practices have gone five nights out of the week, I've lost some daytime hours and have had to adjust to a new routine.

But I have done some writing related thingy-bobs.

1. Observe (because Ali insists on more pictures):

Masterpiece in Progress

What is this? This is my dining room table, covered with chapters from my La Llorona story. (And for those who might be interested in learning more about the legend of La Llorona so you kinda know what the story touches on: here's a good website.) I discovered that I didn't have enough room in my office to spread out, so I took over the dining room. I needed to be able to visualize what I was trying to accomplish.

My plan is basically to work top left corner to bottom right corner...though you can rest assured that the second row of papers you see there will be entirely new by the time I'm done.

***The children have been warned - on penalty of heavy maiming - to NOT TOUCH***

2. Eavesdropped via Twitter on the 20th Annual Pikes Peak Writer's Conference. Apparently Donald Maass was there and made a huge splash - lots and lots of writers tweeting about how encouraging he was. So I was, of course, exceedingly jealous that I wasn't there. (If you'd like to hear what the PPWCers had to say visit the #PPWC2012 hashtag in Twitter. There's a bunch of neat stuff, including some book character costumes from one of the dinners.)

Another thing I ran across during my PPWC stalking was this incredibly useful checklist via DeAnna Knippling. If you're feeling down in the dumps about writing and hitting that Hopeless Phase, she's probably got the solution somewhere on that list.

What'd you guys manage to accomplish this week? Learn anything useful that I can steal?

Monday, April 23, 2012

Terry Pratchett's Volume: High

A couple weekends ago, I attended an event hosted by the Pikes Peak Library District called the Mountain of Authors. It is exactly that: a mountain of traditionally published authors and self published authors all crammed together to listen to panels, talk about writing and publishing trends, and sell books. There must've been about thirty authors plus attendees.

One of the panels covered the e-publishing revolution now dominating all discussions. It was interesting. Agent Sandra Bond, publisher Mike Daniels, and bestselling author Barbara O'Neal talked about what the publishing world looked like nowadays. But one of the most revealing things was something that O'Neal said was important for all writing: finish a lot of books.

In publishing there's a term called 'the long tail.' Basically, it boils down to your backlist making the money for you as an author. Agent Rachelle Gardner has a fantastic post on volume and the long tail here. And she's got another one talking about why writing a few books before looking for publication is a good idea here.

Now, I'll be honest. I always expected to have to write a few books before anything would be published. I made the assumption that, like short stories and poems, the very first one generally doesn't get picked up. Practice makes perfect and all that. However, I did not consider the idea of writing of multiple books to be a good thing publishing-wise. Just never occured to me to think about it. And after reading Gardner's posts, listening to O'Neal talk about buying back her backlist (which is quite extensive), and seeing the piles of books at the Mountain of Authors...I'm convinced that writing a lot of books out of the gate is the way to go.

Terry Pratchett also helped convince me. (Which is useful, as he's the mentor of the month.) Along with Stephen King, James Patterson, Dean Koontz, Laurel K Hamilton, and Nora Roberts, Pratchett has one of the longest tails in the industry. It's pretty easy to visualize what the tail looks like too: dominate a few shelves of space at the library or book store. (What's important to note about the domination of space is that there are multiple titles - not just large quantities of one title.)

And the majority of Pratchett's books are about a world floating on the back of a turtle. Who'd'a thunk it?

But don't go thinking that you have to write a series in order to write a lot of books. After visiting the Terry Pratchett website and counting up the titles...I count 71 books - Discworld isn't everything. Sometimes as many as four books came out in a year. That's a lot of books.

He's still going too, in spite of Alzheimers. There's a new collaboration with Stephen Baxter called The Long Earth which will be out soon.

Does the thought of writing a lot of books intimidate or inspire you? Can you think of any authors who got picked up after writing only one book? How many books do you have in mind for your career?

Thursday, April 19, 2012

With Pictures!

We all know how fantastic Terry Pratchett is, but today I'm going to give some kudos to his illustrators. Over the years, Mr. Pratchett has had a number of different artists do Discworld pieces, and then, he started working with Paul Kidby.

Paul Kidby's style is a superb fit for Pratchett's tone. Look at these covers:

How awesome are they? Then, it gets better. You open up the books and inside is fabulous picture after fabulous picture. And, if you weren't going to any way, you should totally click over to Paul Kidby's Discworld website. See those posters? I want them. Send me those posters for Christmas. Extra brownie points for anyone who sends me a poster w/Death of Rats.

Also, I do have to draw your attention to Where's My Cow? It's not a Paul Kidby collaboration, but Grant does a pretty groovy job, too. Now, it's technically a children's book, but like many of the fun Pixar flicks, there are a couple of nods to the adults in this one. Any Discworld fan will enjoy the inside jokes, and even if you miss the inside jokes, it's still entertaining.

Monday, April 16, 2012

The Rule of Three in Discworld

Perhaps you have heard of the 'Rule of Three' in comedy writing. For those that haven't, I point you to a really down-and-dirty quick definition/explantion by John Kinde:

"The first two items in the triplet set the pattern (the "straight" line) and the third item breaks the pattern (the curve/the twist/the derailment). Breaking the pattern heightens the tension and creates the surprise, usually resulting in laughter."

He's got a more detailed explanation here.

But I've found that it's always good to have masterful examples - all the better to illustrate. And who could be better or teach more about the rule of three than Terry Pratchett? His books are riddled with countless examples.

Example 1:
In Going Postal, Pratchett opens with a "The Nine-Thousand-Year Prologue." He describes ships and wreckage floating on rivers beneath the ocean's surface - which is quite whimsical to begin with.

Then you come across this line: "Some stricken ships have rigging; some even have sails. Many still have crew, tangled in the rigging or lashed to the wheel."

(Yes, the 'ew' factor makes it funny too.)

But you have set-up: "Some stricken ships have rigging;"
You have the continuing line : "some even have sails"
You have the derailment: "Many still have crew, tangled in the rigging or lashed to the wheel."

That's on the second page.

Example 2:
Also in Going Postal:
The scene - Moist is about to be hanged in front of a large crowd. Pratchett tells us: "There was a stir when they climbed up into the chilly morning air, followed by a few boos and even some applause."

Set-up: "People were strange like that."
The continuing line: "Steal five dollars and you were a petty thief."
The derailment: "Steal thousands of dollars and you were either a government or a hero."

Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to write your own funny 'triplet.' You can have a second or two to set your stage, but after that we've gotta be able to see the set up, the continuing line, and then surprise us with your derailment.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Underwater Inspiration

Underwater New York wants you to write a piece in 500 words or less that is inspired by one of the items on their list. Here's the call for submissions. The list is definitely an eclectic assortment of items and I'm sure you can find at least one that gets your writer brain ticking.

Click on over to the list, check out some of the pictures, and get writing. The deadline is May 1st.

Happy Writing!

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Still Typing: A Tuesday Post of Accountability

Hello writer-friends. It's Tuesday, which means that it's time to be accountable...which I wasn't last Tuesday.

Quick reason for no posting last Tuesday: My grandmother died on March 31. It was rather an emotional week that manifested some strange things.

The first of which - Last Monday (the Monday after her death) I decided to go crazy and write a book in a day. For those of you who would wish to attempt this feat, here's what you have to do in a nutshell: type 8 pages an hour for 24 hours.

I was unsuccessful.

But I think I've figured out the emotional component that made me want to attempt such a reaching kind of thing. It's this: my grandmother never read anything I wrote. Because I've never really finished a draft that I was proud to show her, or the readers that surround me. I have the rough drafts and sketches and all that stuff we writers accumulate. I've shown these things to my fellow writers, but not to any readers.

Which, I've decided, is stupid.

What the hell am I doing this for if it isn't for people to read the stories?

I'm over halfway there for my book-in-a-week. And I think it's accomplished a multi-purpose emotional set of tasks:

1. I know that I can finish a rough draft relatively quickly - even quicker than a NaNo pace. So that has given me a sense of time...I have plenty of it to accomplish the telling of stories.

2. Writing is fun. Don't focus on the publishing, people. If you're focusing on the publishing and 'business' elements, you're not writing anything anyone wants to read. I'm sorry, but that's just the truth. If you just take the time to cut loose and enjoy yourself, you'll accomplish a lot more and have more fun doing it.

3. Be willing to show the people you love what you're up to. I'm sure a lot of you have read the Door Open/Door Closed section of Stephen King's On Writing. He's describing writing with the door closed and then, when the rough draft is finished there's this offhand line: "it's time to give up the goods." I hadn't thought much of that line - it seemed to me that he was saying "show it if you wanna show it."

But what it really means is: Give up the goods.

(Profound, I know.)

Yes, there's editing to do. Yes, you're gonna change things. But the people that love you and surround you want to see some evidence of what you've been up to. Some of them actually want to read it and give you encouragement/advice/their opinion. Don't spoil it for them.  
***If they actually read it you also get the added bonus of having something to discuss with them - what they think, what they dislike, what they were impressed by, and what they wished they didn't know about you.***

4. Palate cleanser. I needed a break from the two humungous projects I've been working on. (One in a first draft bang-it-out state of affairs, and the other in a rewrite phase.) I've realized that I have a ton and half interesting ideas and that it's okay to splurge and refresh every now and then. I don't think I could've emotionally dealt with the two in-progress projects last week - I've placed too much on them intellectually and emotionally. A fuck-it-whatever piece was just what I needed to recollect myself.

That's what I've learned this past week-and-half-or-so. What've you guys been up to?

P.S. In case you're wondering - the novel is a steampunk romance mystery with Jack the Ripper. I think it might make an interesting series...we'll see!

Monday, April 9, 2012

Illustrations and Story: The Last Hero

Novels and short stories, by their nature, are word-based. According to this article from the New York Times, "Your Brain on Fiction,": "Brain scans are revealing what happens in our heads when we read a detailed description, an evocative metaphor or an emotional exchange between characters. Stories, this research is showing, stimulate the brain and even change how we act in life."

I'd like to direct your attention to "detailed description." Detailed description and metaphor excite our senses and via reading we have an experience.

In Terry Pratchett's Discworld series, he opened his very first novel The Color of Magic with this description of Discworld: "Great A'tuin the turtle comes, swimming slowly through the interstellar gulf, hydrogen frost on his ponderous limbs, his huge and ancient shell pocked with meteor craters. Through sea-sized eyes that are crusted with rheum and asteroid dust He stares fixedly at the Destination....Most of the weight [of the world] is of course accounted for by Berilia, Tubul, Great T'Phon and Jerakeen, the four giant elephants upon whose broad and star-tanned shoulders the disc of the world rests...."

I think by all definitions of the word 'interesting' that this description is interesting. It is detailed. But, for me, it was hard to picture. In my head I stacked the turtle, then elephant, then elephant, then elephant, then elephant, and then the disc of the world teetering precariously on top. Kinda like a circus trick.

Then I got ahold of The Last Hero: A Discworld Fable, written by Terry Pratchett and illustrated by Paul Kidby. One of the opening illustrations is Great A'Tuin and his giant shell. Then the elephants are on his back, but not stacked. The elephants basically take up the 'four corners' of the shell and the Discworld is balanced - and seems much more stable - on their four backs.

While reading may stimulate us...I think that Pratchett's narrative is aided by illustration. To ask a reader to picture elephants on a turtle's back, and then in turn carry the world is not a huge problem. I've read Native American creation stories and Greek myths that demand the same kind of imaginative leap. But I like Pratchett's story better now that I have seen the world. Prior to checking out The Last Hero the only thing I really knew about Discworld was that it was supposed to be funny...and therefore I made elephant circus stacks, instead of the more physically reasonable weight distribution illustrated by Kidby.

I think the best illustrations - for stories and novels, not books that are centered on the visual like graphic novels - are those that illuminate and clarify something that is difficult to picture. The original Alice in Wonderland has great illustrations, helping the reader picture what it's like to play croquet with bird and hedgehogs. Places like Discworld and Wonderland - places where the normal is not easy to picture - are helped greatly by some kind of illustration, in my opinion. As clear as a writer is...sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words.

How about you guys? Do you find illustrations helpful or bothersome? Do you prefer stories 'without pictures' as Alice would say? Or are pictures a bonus?

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Short and Sweet

"Je n'ai fait celle-ci plus longue que parce que je n'ai pas eu le loisir de la faire plus courte." - Blaise Pascal

Or, translated, it means, "I made this letter long, because I did not have time to make it short."

A perfect introduction to this week's prompt. I recently found The Postcard Press, which is a fun flash fiction (or short poetry) concept. The press publishes in postcard format and you're strictly limited on how long your piece can be, because, well, it has to fit on a postcard. We're talking about Terry Pratchett's marvelous, wacky fantasy, and The Postcard Press has a call for submissions about magic. Submissions are due by the end of May.

Check out submission details at their website and get cranking on your magic.

Happy Writing!

Thursday, April 5, 2012


Here's one for all you book/book store/library lovers. Terry Pratchett's definition of L-Space:

Libraries, nature of.
Even big collections of ordinary books distort space and time, as can readily be proved by anyone who has been around a really old-fashioned second-hand bookshop, one of those that has more staircases than storeys and those rows of shelves that end in little doors that are surely too small for a full sized human to enter.

The relevant equation is Knowledge = Power = Energy = Matter = Mass; a good bookshop is just a genteel Black Hole that knows how to read. Mass distorts space into polyfractal L-space, in which Everywhere is also Everywhere Else.

All libraries are connected in L-space by the bookwormholes created by the strong space-time distortions found in any large collection of books. Only a very few librarians learn the secret, and there are inflexible rules about making use of the fact - because it amounts to time travel.

The three rules of the Librarians of Time and Space are: (1) Silence; (2) Books must be returned no later than the last date shown, and (3) the nature of causality must not be interfered with.

For those of you who may be new to Pratchett, check out this nifty Reading Order Guide (thanks, Chris, for sending the updated version!). It shows you connections between the books and lays them out in groups according to characters.

Monday, April 2, 2012

Terry Pratchett and A Good Reason to Go To Conferences

Welcome to April and our new mentor:

Terry Pratchett!!!!

Now, I don't know where you guys are in the world, but I live in Colorado Springs and the last weekend of April is always the Pikes Peak Writers Conference. Unfortunately, I'm not attending this year (I have no money, though they do offer scholarships if you're interested!).

I know a lot of people go to conferences because there's generally the incredible opportunity to meet agents and editors - and writers are always interested in what they can do to further their careers.

But there are other reasons to go to a conference, and Terry Pratchett reminded me of that reason. I came across an interview he did with the BBC. Pratchett was talking about attending science fiction conventions - similar enough to conferences in my opinion.

The reason?


I know agents and editors are cool people. I had the great pleasure to hear Dan Lazar of Writer's House and Kristin Nelson of Nelson Literary give workshops on querying and pitching and all that good stuff. They were professional, had awesome advice, and generally seemed like a couple folks I wouldn't mind having a beer with.

That being said...I was also surrounded by writers and their stories. I listened in on critique sessions. I attended a writing exercise workshop led by my buddy Bret. I heard Jim Butcher and Robert Crais talk. A conference is like a weekend-long mentorship. There're so many people to meet, so many things to do, and - most important - so many things to learn.

In the interview (you can watch it below, it's only a couple minutes) Pratchett talks about meeting Arthur C. Clarke and Moorcock. He says that these guys seemed like 'normal guys' and he was a 'normal guy' so...maybe he could do this for real too. When I attended the conference I thought something very similar: these bestselling authors are approachable, fun, and smart. They work hard. But they're regular Joes. My actual thought was something like: "I'm on the playing field!" (Sure, I'm on the bench at the moment, learning from the experts...but I'm not in the stands! I'm a player!)

And just to prove my point that 'normal people' can do this: I attended that conference with my friend Fleur. She was also going around, listening to the same talks, going to the same workshops. She's fun, approachable, smart, and she works hard. And guess what? Her book is coming out in October.

(Shameless plug - and there will be more - if you have a child in elementary school, or if you are a librarian for an elementary/middle school you should know that her book is Double Vision by F.T. Bradley and it's awesome. More info forthcoming.)

Has anyone had a similar experience at a conference? Have you ever just gotten that energetic boost from being around other talented people?


Sunday, April 1, 2012

Let's Get Visual!

Art and literature go together like sarcasm and teenagers, so this week, I bring you a call for submissions for the Make Believe Anthology. - Click on the link to see submission details and your inspirational artwork.

My favorite part of the call for submissions is this requirement: "However, as it so very obviously looks like Red Riding Hood, we will accept no Red Riding Hood stories. Your story must be unique an not a rewrite of the famed, old tale."

Got it? Good.

Due date is April 11!

Happy Writing!